• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Human Research Protection Program

University of Southern CaliforniaResearch and Innovation
  • HRPP
  • Getting Started
  • Research
  • IRB
  • Expanded Access
You are here: Home / IRB Member Toolbox

IRB Member Toolbox

The University of Southern California is committed to conducting Biomedical and Social Behavioral Research involving human participants following the ethical principles embodied in The Belmont Report. There are four Institutional Review Boards (IRB) at USC responsible for protecting the rights and welfare of study participants.

IRB members are required to possess knowledge of the federal regulations, ethical principles of human subjects’ research, IRB policies, and apply them appropriately. This page contains information and resources for IRB members. Please also refer to Chapter 5 of our policies for more information.

IRB Member Checklist (New and Continuing)

  • Email Ben Martinez to obtain the IRB Handbook
  • Complete IRB Member 101 CITI Training and keep current (renews every 3 years)
  • Watch Zoom Training Guides
  • Review IRB Member Evaluation Criteria
  • Have team contact information handy for assistance
  • Visit HRPP website to review up-to-date information monthly
IRB Member Meeting Expectations

Meeting attendance

  • All members will receive an email invitation generated through iStar to attend full board committee meetings. Each member is required to respond to the meeting invitation via iStar and indicate whether they will be attending the meeting.
  • If you have indicated you will be in attendance, and you cannot make the meeting, please inform Ben Martinez as soon as possible, this allows us to make sure we still have a quorum.

Who will lead the convened meetings?

  • Meetings will be led by the Chair assigned to the board unless another Chair is asked to lead the meeting or take over the meeting when/if the assigned Chair becomes indisposed.
  • The Associate Director of the IRB or a designee will host or co-host the meeting to ensure that the members are admitted to the meeting, are able to participate successfully, and to support the Chair to manage the technology during the meeting.

Zoom Expectations

During the meeting, each member is expected to:

  1. Join and attend the meeting preferably, on camera.
  2. Be fully present, participate in the discussion (including via chat), and vote using the “raise hand” function.
  3. Keep audio on mute if the member is not presenting or discussing a study.
  4. Vote using the “raise hand” function.

If assistance with  or training with computer resources is required, please reach out to Ben and we will try to accommodate your request.

IRB Member Review Expectations

Reviewing Assigned Protocols

  • The staff will try to only assign reviews to those who have indicated their intention to attend; however, if attendance is limited or specific expertise is required for the review, a member may be assigned to review a study, regardless of if the member will attend the convened meeting.
  • Members review all IRB application materials, including the reviews for all matters on the agenda, including the meeting minutes and expedited actions, in advance of the meeting so that they can participate fully in the meeting discussions.
  • Once assigned a study, the member should try to post the review by noon the day prior to the convened meeting. Posting by noon the day prior gives the IRB Analysts the time to follow up with any communication with the study teams. Reviews are expected to be posted prior to the meeting. This gives the other members time to read the review prior to the meeting.

What if I have an emergency and/or cannot complete my review?

  • If a member is assigned as a reviewer that person will be expected to complete the review unless extenuating circumstances make it impossible (e.g., work or family emergency). Under those circumstances, the member should inform the IRB analyst as soon as possible so the study can be assigned to another reviewer.

How should I conduct my review?

  1. Briefly summarize the study for the other members.
    • Example: “This is an investigational study with 2 investigative arms, which include previously approved drugs, etc.”
  1. Next, review each section of the study and discuss any identified risks.

Review plan for new study being presented:

  1. What is the objective of the study?
  2. Is the study design appropriate to learn about the objectives?
  3. How is the study team finding participants (recruitment)?
  4. If there are treatment groups, what are they doing?
  5. What are the outcome measures and endpoints?
  6. Address sub-categories, if applicable: Device, Drug, Minors, Pregnant Women/neonates, Prisoners
  7. Are the risks reflected in participant facing materials (Informed Consent, etc)

Tips for Presenting Review:

Review the IRB Analyst review and contact the IRBA if there are additional questions, clarifications, or concerns.

Consider:

  • Are there ways to alleviate the risk?
  • Are there conflicts of interest that should be considered?
  • Is the inclusion criteria and recruitment methods equitable?
  • If applicable, are there proper site permissions?
  • Is there deception/coercion in the study?
  • Does it affect the risk determination?
  • How do the above factors make a difference in risk?

Continuing Review:

1. Brief summary of study.
2. What continuing review number is this (ie, how many prior CR’s have
there been?)
3. Summary of any changes that have happened since the last year
through amendments.

    • Change in participants?
    • If applicable, any dosing changes in drugs?
    • Additional new drugs/devices/treatments?
    • Etc.

4. What is the enrollment?

    • If enrolling participants that speak something other than English, how many participants have been enrolled?

5. Does the study team need to update any participant facing materials (ICF/recruitment/surveys) because of non-English Speaking participants?

6. Any changes to the Informed consent form that should be noted?

    • Does the ICF need to be updated to reflect new risks?

7. Please pay special attention to any reportable events over the last year.

    • What were they? Were they resolved or still ongoing?
    • Were there any CAPA’s (corrective and preventive action plans)?
IRB: Behind the Scenes
  • A day in the life of Biomedical Sr. Analyst
  • Getting a study ready for a full board meeting
  • Process of full board meeting minutes
IRB Member Education
  • Research with Psychedelics
  • Emergency Use
  • IRB Member Conflict of Interest
  • Human Research Protection Foundational Training
  • Privacy and Confidentiality in Research
  • Humanitarian Use Devices
  • FDA Regulatory Update
  • Noncompliance and Process
  • IRB Criteria for Approval
  • IRB Actions

SB IRB Member Education

  • Initial Review
  • Continuing Review
  • Amendments
  • Criteria for Approval
  • IRB Actions
  • Board Considerations
IRB Member Resources
  • IRB Member Email and iStar Notifications
  • HRPP/IRB Announcements and Latest Updates
IRB Member Evaluations

IRB members are evaluated annually at the end of the Fiscal Year (June) with the IRB Associate Directors and/or the HRPP Director. Performance is assessed according to the criteria outlined in the USC Member Standards and Responsibilities.  IRB members will be re-appointed if expectations are met, and written feedback is provided to all members about their performance.

  • IRB Chair Self-Evaluation Survey
  • IRB Member Self-Evaluation Survey
Contact Information

If you are experiencing issues with joining an IRB meeting please contact hrpp@usc.edu or call (323) 442-0114. 

Please view our Contact Information Sheet for all contact information.

Office for Human Research Protections Resources

5 Videos
IRB Meetings and Membership

IRB Meetings and Membership

1:02:56
Criteria for IRB Approval of Research

Criteria for IRB Approval of Research

1:01:29
Membership Requirements for Institutional Review Boards (IRB)

Membership Requirements for Institutional Review Boards (IRB)

13:02
Quorum and Voting in IRB Meetings

Quorum and Voting in IRB Meetings

22:16
I.R.B. Review Criteria

I.R.B. Review Criteria

12:44

Zoom Guides

4 Videos
Joining a Zoom Meeting

Joining a Zoom Meeting

3:31
Basic In-Meeting Navigation

Basic In-Meeting Navigation

3:54
Zoom Meeting Layouts and Views

Zoom Meeting Layouts and Views

3:10
Meeting Reactions and Nonverbal Feedback

Meeting Reactions and Nonverbal Feedback

3:29

Footer

HRPP

3720 S. Flower Street, Suite 325
Los Angeles, CA 90089

HRPP@usc.edu
(323) 442-0114

Full Accreditation badge from the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs

About Us

  • Home
  • Announcements
  • Getting Started
  • Internal Staff Webpage
  • HRPP
    • Contact
    • Education & Certification
    • HRPP Performance & Metrics
    • Policies and Procedures
    • Post Approval Monitoring (PAM)
    • Youtube Channel

Research

  • Biomedical Research
    • Research Repositories
    • Investigational Drugs and Devices
    • Investigator-Initiated Trials
    • Emergency Research
  • SBIRB Social Behavioral Research
  • Student Researchers
  • Reliance Agreements
    • Requesting USC to Rely on an External IRB
    • Requesting USC IRB to Act as the sIRB
  • Starting a Research Trial: the Basics

IRB

  • IRB FAQs
  • Forms and Templates
  • FWA and IRB Registration Numbers
  • IRB Member Toolbox
  • IRB Review: How to
  • IRB Submission Guidelines
  • Levels of IRB Review
  • Not Human Subjects Research (NHSR)
  • Post IRB Review and Approval
  • Privacy, Confidentiality, and Anonymity in Human Subjects Research
  • Urgent Review

HRPP
3720 S. Flower Street, Suite 325
Los Angeles, CA 90089
oprs@usc.edu
irb@usc.edu
(323) 442-0114

Full Accreditation badge from the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs
University of Southern California   Content managed by HRPP
  • Privacy Notice - Notice of Non-Discrimination